Due to Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth’s Sign chat leak scandal, the Donald Trump administration was caught in a serious whirlwind inside a couple of months of coming to energy on the White Home. The scandal’s extent new no bounds because it stayed within the information cycle for weeks on finish, and now a prime spokesperson, who was as soon as a supporter of Hegseth, is claiming that the Protection Secretary’s days within the Trump administration at the moment are numbered.
Are Hegseth’s days as Protection Secretary almost over?
In a Politico opinion piece, former Pentagon spokesperson John Ullyot stated that Hegseth might be changed very quickly wanting on the aftermaths of the Sign chat leak fiasco. In keeping with Ullyot, this incident had put the Trump administration on the backfoot for fairly a couple of weeks, inflicting various “meltdowns”. Within the opinion piece, Ullyot penned that Donald Trump might contemplate firing Pete Hegseth particularly as a result of public crises that started as a result of Sign chat leak and its aftermaths.
High former Pentagon spokesperson lays down opinion
Within the opinion piece, former spokesperson Ullyot additionally talked about that, “Donald Trump is understood for demanding accountability from his prime officers. Contemplating the sunshine of current occasions surrounding Pete Hegseth, it’s tough imagining him staying within the place for very lengthy.”
Nonetheless, curiously, it’s the exact same Ullyot who had praised Pete Hegseth again in December, claiming that the Protection Secretary was “effectively certified for the job”. In keeping with the opinion piece, Ullyot advised that there was a “full-blown meltdown on the White Home due to the Sign chat leak fiasco.”
ALSO READ | Meet Tiffany Fong, Crypto influencer who refused Elon Musk’s ‘child’ provide
The previous Pentagon spokesperson additionally admitted that the problem had change into an actual drawback for the administration at one level. He additionally termed these current troubles because the “Month from Hell” in his opinion piece, as per reviews.
The Politico piece additionally talked about that, “Hegseth shared particulars concerning the Yemen strike in a second Sign chat that included his spouse and brother” that was delivered to mild by the New York Instances’ report. In Ullyot’s phrases, “There are very probably extra footwear to drop in brief order, with even larger bombshell tales coming this week.”
What was the Sign chat leak all about?
The Sign chat leak, also referred to as Signalgate, occurred in March 2025 when U.S. Nationwide Safety Advisor Mike Waltz mistakenly added Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, to a Sign group chat involving high-ranking Trump administration officers, together with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
The group was discussing labeled operational particulars of deliberate U.S. airstrikes towards Houthi targets in Yemen, together with particular weapon programs, launch occasions, and delicate intelligence, such because the id of an undercover CIA officer. The leak sparked scrutiny over using unsecured messaging apps for delicate authorities communications, potential violations of records-preservation legal guidelines. Whereas the White Home downplayed the incident, it raised broader considerations about cybersecurity dangers, together with vulnerabilities in Sign exploited by overseas entities like Russian hackers.
