The Supreme Courtroom will hear oral arguments subsequent month within the case difficult President Donald Trump’s try to finish birthright citizenship, in what’s more likely to be some of the extremely anticipated circumstances to be reviewed by the excessive court docket since Trump took workplace.
The justices mentioned Thursday that they might hear arguments on the consolidated circumstances on Might 15, roughly 4 weeks from now.
The Trump administration in March requested the Supreme Courtroom to intervene and permit a slender model of the president’s government order ending birthright citizenship to proceed. Trump signed the order on his first day in workplace and was instantly met with a flurry of lawsuits throughout the nation.
The administration’s enchantment issues three nationwide injunctions introduced in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
TRUMP ADMIN APPEALS RULING BLOCKING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP

Supreme Courtroom Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor attend the inauguration on the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20. (Ricky Carioti/The Washington Put up by way of Getty Photos)
All three states had issued nationwide injunctions blocking the birthright citizenship ban from taking pressure — a transfer that attorneys for the Trump administration argued of their Supreme Courtroom submitting was overly broad.
Appearing U.S. Solicitor Normal Sarah Harris requested the justices to restrict the scope of the rulings to cowl solely people instantly impacted by the related courts.
“These circumstances — which contain challenges to the President’s January 20, 2025 Government Order regarding birthright citizenship — increase essential constitutional questions with main ramifications for securing the border,” Harris wrote of their enchantment.
Up to now, no court docket has sided with the Trump administration’s government order looking for to ban birthright citizenship, although a number of district courts have blocked it from taking impact.
NINTH CIRCUIT REJECTS TRUMP’S BID TO REINSTATE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP ORDER

Supreme Courtroom justices attend the State of the Union tackle by President Joe Biden on the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March 7, 2024. (Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Photos)
Implementation of Trump’s government order was initially set for Feb. 19. The coverage would have affected tons of of 1000’s of youngsters born within the U.S. every year.
The order sought to reinterpret the 14th Modification, which states: “All individuals born or naturalized in america, and topic to the jurisdiction thereof, are residents of america and of the State whereby they reside.”
Beneath the Trump administration’s proposed interpretation — later blocked by federal courts — kids born to unlawful immigrants or to those that have been right here legally however on non permanent non-immigrant visas, usually are not residents by birthright.
Greater than 22 U.S. states and immigrants’ rights teams shortly sued the Trump administration to dam the change to birthright citizenship, arguing in court docket filings that the manager order is each unconstitutional and “unprecedented.”
CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The states have additionally argued that the 14th Modification does, in truth, assure citizenship to individuals born on U.S. soil and naturalized within the U.S.
The U.S. is considered one of roughly 30 international locations the place birthright citizenship applies.