Senator Mitch McConnell is likely one of the most necessary People of the twenty-first Century. However for his management, I’m fairly assured that President Obama would have been capable of fill Justice Scalia’s seat. And had Donald Trump not been capable of run on filling that emptiness, I’m fairly assured that Hillary Clinton would have prevailed. After which Clinton would have promptly changed Justice Ginsburg, and possibly even Justices Kennedy or Sotomayor. Our nation would look very completely different if Clinton served for 2 phrases with a 5-4 or a 6-3 Supreme Courtroom majority behind her.
Again to actuality. Justice Gorsuch is sitting in Justice Scalia’s seat. Justices Kavanaugh and Barrett changed Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg. President Trump prevailed in 2016 and in 2024. And the Courtroom’s usually-conservative majority will seemingly endure for a technology. And Senator McConnell can take plenty of that credit score.
That background brings me to an necessary essay by Mike Fragoso, who served as McConnell’s Chief Counsel, after serving as Chief Counsel on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Fragoso, who recently joined the EPPC, is likely one of the most astute observers in regards to the judiciary. I’ve lengthy admired his work. Furthermore, he brings inside insights from his expertise.
Fragoso’s latest piece is titled “In Protection of Amy Coney Barrett: Why She Was Nominated to the Supreme Courtroom.” The subtitle is “Republicans could not have crammed the seat with out Justice Barrett. Mitch McConnell knew this, and for that purpose insisted that she wanted to be the nominee.” Fragoso makes a number of necessary factors.
First, Fragoso argues that Trump had to select a lady to exchange Justice Ginsburg:
The primary subject was defensive politics, which dictated that the choose wanted to be a lady. As a political matter it might have been untenable to exchange Justice Ginsburg with a person. With an election mere months away, and college-educated girls being a dependable and more and more progressive voting bloc, subjecting them to the indignity of changing “the Infamous RBG” with a person would have additional radicalized them. This was a political actuality that President Trump had lengthy understood—he was, in spite of everything, broadly reported to have needed a lady accessible to exchange Ginsburg within the occasion a emptiness arose throughout his presidency. . . .
This is not what a few of Barrett’s critics name—ridiculously—”DEI”; it is politics. Barrett was a extremely enticing candidate to a specific, necessary constituency of the Republican coalition—non secular girls—who had been prepared and prepared to make their voices heard to wavering senators.
I agree with Fragoso that the nominee needed to be a lady. This kind of desire just isn’t new. President Reagan pledged to appoint a lady to the Supreme Courtroom, and his nominee was Sandra Day O’Connor. After John Roberts’s nomination was elevated to the Chief Justice seat, President George W. Bush dedicated to appoint a lady to exchange Justice O’Connor, and he chosen Harriet Miers. President Biden dedicated to nominating a black girl for the Supreme Courtroom, and he nominated Choose Ketanji Brown Jackson. Within the outdated days, there was a Supreme Courtroom seat reserved for a Catholic. And even earlier, seats had been reserved for northerners and southerners. I see nothing novel a few President making politics calculations, broadly outlined, when making a Supreme Courtroom nomination.
I additionally agree, as a sensible level, that Trump needed to choose a lady to exchange RBG in 2020. It’s no shock that the one two nominees mentioned had been Barrett and Choose Barbara Lagoa of the eleventh Circuit. Choose Neomi Rao was apparently not a part of that conversation–a matter for an additional time.
Optics matter for Supreme Courtroom nominees–especially for President Trump. Trump repeatedly boasted that Neil Gorsuch got here out of “central casting.” (Trump by no means stated that about Kavanaugh.) Barrett is photogenic, charismatic, and would enchantment to a large swath of the conservative base shortly earlier than the election. It is not shocking why he would have picked her.
Second, Fragoso says that Barrett was simpler to verify resulting from the truth that her file was thinner:
On the identical time, the Judiciary Committee fights over and evaluations their paperwork—opinions, speeches, briefs, public-service work merchandise. So as to get this carried out in a month we wanted a nominee who wouldn’t require a lot preparation herself and who did not have a voluminous file with which to lavatory down the Senate in procedural fights.
Barrett had a manageable file. She had been a choose for round three years, which supplied a longtime however digestible file. (As my employees advised me on the time, it helped that she was a perfectly clear author.) Her earlier service as a professor additionally meant that her prior profession was not burdened with numerous authorized briefs or interminable executive-branch work emails. At one level, when Democrats complained that they needed paperwork from Notre Dame, I requested in the event that they actually anticipated me to ask for the minutes of the school parking committee.
There may be a lot to unpack in these few sentences. Fragoso writes that Barrett didn’t have a “voluminous file.” He is proper! She had solely been a choose “for round three years” giving her a “digestible file.” He is proper! Her file was not “burdened with numerous authorized briefs.” He is proper! Fragoso is completely appropriate that these attributes had been useful to promptly verify a nominee. However her lack of a file demonstrates why she ought to have by no means been added to the quick listing within the first place. The aim of a file is to show what an individual was prepared to publicly do with their occupation. Barrett merely didn’t do very a lot. Critics had been incensed once I wrote about how skinny her file was. But Fragoso confirms there simply wasn’t a lot there. Possibly she selected to spend her time doing different issues. That was actually her selection. However these different issues didn’t create a bona fide file for being a federal choose. What number of Supreme Courtroom clerks, who grew to become regulation professors, obtain Article III commissions. The quantity may be very, very small. Once more, Barrett was added to the quick listing earlier than she determined a single case. And that was based mostly on a restricted file, with no related authorized briefs, and few writings on issues of public controversy.
In September 2015, Randy Barnett and I wrote an article in The Weekly Normal, titled The Next Justices: A guide for GOP candidates on how to fill Court vacancies. The second rule we provided was that “Paper trails are an asset, not a disqualification.” Fragoso could also be proper that having a smaller paper path made her simpler to verify. However that shouldn’t be a marker of a powerful judicial candidate. Question if Justice Alito had stepped down in June 2019, and there was ample time to verify somebody earlier than the election. Would Barrett have nonetheless been the nom?
Fragoso mocks those that thinks Barrett is the “second coming of David Souter.” Not fairly. I feel Justice O’Connor can be a a lot nearer facsimile in trendy historical past, although Justice Frankfurter is an in depth second.
In June 2018, Senator McConnell signaled that he most well-liked Choose Thapar to exchange Justice Kennedy over then-Choose Kavanaugh, partly, as a result of Thapar had a neater file to parse. The New York Times reported on the time:
Whereas cautious to not immediately make the case for any would-be justice, Mr. McConnell made clear in a number of cellphone calls with Mr. Trump and the White Home counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, that the prolonged paper path of one other prime contender, Choose Brett M. Kavanaugh, would pose difficulties for his affirmation.
Mr. McConnell is worried in regards to the quantity of the paperwork that Choose Kavanaugh has created in his 12 years on the US Courtroom of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in addition to in his roles as White Home employees secretary beneath President George W. Bush and assistant to Kenneth W. Starr, the unbiased counsel who investigated President Invoice Clinton.
The variety of pages is claimed to run into the hundreds of thousands, which Mr. McConnell fears might hand Senate Democrats a chance to delay the affirmation vote till after the brand new session of the courtroom begins in October, with the midterm elections looming the subsequent month. And whereas Choose Kavanaugh’s judicial opinions are publicly identified, Mr. McConnell is uneasy about relitigating Bush-era controversies, the officers briefed on his discussions with Mr. Trump stated.
With Senator John McCain’s absence due to mind most cancers, Republicans have simply 50 votes, and Mr. McConnell doesn’t wish to draw the ire of his libertarian-leaning Kentucky colleague, Senator Rand Paul, who opposed hawkish Bush insurance policies. Aides to Mr. Trump and Mr. McConnell declined requests for remark.
Mr. McConnell is equally cautious of imperiling the votes of two average Republicans, Senators Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine. He has advised Mr. Trump he might lose the 2 senators, who assist abortion rights, if he picks one other choose seen as a contender, Amy Coney Barrett, an outspoken social conservative who some observers consider could also be extra open to overturning Roe v. Wade.
McConnell was proper about Kavanaugh. Earlier than any of us had ever heard of Christine Blasey Ford, the most important subject with Kavanaugh was his paper path within the Bush White Home. Does anybody even bear in mind Corey Booker’s Spartacus Moment? Then once more, Barrett was apparently into account, and McConnell thought she can be tougher to verify. McConnell anxious that Murkowksi and Collins wouldn’t vote for Barrett in 2018. In 2020, Murkowski voted for Barrett, however Collins didn’t. Collins stated she objected to the timing of the nominee earlier than the election. I think Collins would have vote for Barrett in 2019, however who is aware of. Nonetheless, why was Barrett even within the operating for the Kennedy seat? In June 2018, Barrett had been a choose for barely a year–proof once more that her lack of a file was seen as a professional and never a con. The cake was baked for her as quickly as she was nominated to the Seventh Circuit.
Third, Fragoso speaks to the “dogma” incident.
The second subject was offensive politics. Ever because the late Senator Dianne Feinstein had advised then-Professor Barrett, “The dogma lives loudly inside you,” Barrett had been a folks hero amongst Catholic Republicans and social conservatives. Virtually each Catholic within the D.C. space had a “dogma” mug. A nominee with a longtime, unbiased political model was manna from heaven by way of producing assist for a snap affirmation amongst probably squeamish Republicans.
Did each Catholic in D.C. actually have a “dogma” mug? I’ve solely ever seen a handful of them. In candor, I feel this story has grow to be one thing of an city legend. I wrote in regards to the Feinstein alternate right here:
I went again and rewatched the entire clip on CSPAN. After Feinstein stated it, Barrett kind of stared blankly in incredulity at Feinstein, and the colloquy ended. Barrett by no means truly stated something in response. Feinstein pivoted to ask some query of Choose Joan Larsen. I do know this “dogma” line made Barrett one thing of a mini-celebrity, however I by no means fairly understood why. This isn’t like Clarence Thomas and Joe Biden going toe-to-toe. Furthermore, Feinstein on the time was affected by senility. (It’s no coincidence that senile and Senate share the identical root.) Feinstein made an completely inappropriate assertion that was universally panned. And Barrett was simply confirmed.
The clean look that Barrett gave to Feinstein jogged my memory of the face she made after shaking Trump’s hand on the State of the Union. This was not the visage of a cool operator. This was the visceral response of an individual who did not know what to do, and momentarily forgot she was on digital camera.
Fragoso concludes:
Republicans could not have crammed the seat with out Barrett. McConnell knew this, and for that purpose insisted that she wanted to be the nominee. With out Amy Coney Barrett, whoever Biden would have put in that seat would have made Ruth Bader Ginsburg appear like Robert Bork.
I’d not presume to second-guess McConnell’s vote counts of his personal caucus. As soon as Ginsburg died, it was going to be Barrett. Possibly one of the best protection of Justice Barrett is that nobody else might have been confirmed in that window, and it was higher to have a Justice Barrett than an empty seat that will be Biden. And with the advantage of hindsight, with all of the tumult after the 2020 election, it might have been very tough to verify anybody. However that’s not a lot of a protection of Barrett’s nomination on the deserves. That protection can solely be made based mostly on her file in the intervening time she was added to the Supreme Courtroom quick listing.
My objection immediately, because it has all the time been, was that Barrett ought to haven’t been appointed as a Circuit Choose together with her admittedly skinny file, and shouldn’t have been positioned on the quick listing earlier than she determined a case. Barrett had her backers who vigorously pushed and promoted her based mostly on the “belief me” promise. We actually haven’t discovered a lot since folks stated “belief me” about John Roberts. We can’t belief supporters of any judicial nominee. The response should be, show it.
