The choose presiding over Fulton County District Lawyer Fani Willis’ case introduced Monday that the previous regulation companion of particular prosecutor Nathan Wade must testify in courtroom on his data of the timeline of the intimate relationship between Willis and Wade.
Protection counsel claimed the ex-law companion, Terrence Bradley, had direct data that Willis and Wade’s relationship began earlier than Wade was employed within the election interference case involving former President Donald Trump. The testimony of Bradley, who can be Wade’s former divorce lawyer, is predicted to renew Tuesday afternoon.
The choose’s resolution got here after an in-camera listening to Monday with Bradley and his lawyer, after the choose beforehand mentioned it appeared Bradley could have been misusing his attorney-client privilege.
Relating to information from Wade’s cellphone, which Trump attorneys have been attempting to get entered into proof, the choose mentioned he’ll take that challenge up throughout an already scheduled listening to this Friday.
NATHAN WADE VISITED FANI WILLIS’ NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE HIRING, CELLPHONE DATA INDICATES
Fulton County DA Willis and Particular Prosecutor Wade have been chargeable for bringing the Georgia 2020 election interference case towards Trump and 18 others final 12 months.
Trump’s workforce filed a response with the Fulton County Superior Court docket on Monday to Willis’ denial following their authentic submitting related to the cellphone information.
SPECIAL ATTORNEY HIRED BY FANI WILLIS TO HELP PROSECUTE TRUMP DONATED BIG BUCKS TO HER CAMPAIGN
A Friday submitting from an legal professional for Trump claims to point out at the least 35 visits by Wade to the Hapeville neighborhood earlier than he was employed.
Wade testified final week that he didn’t go to Willis’ condominium greater than 10 occasions earlier than being employed in November 2021. Willis and Wade preserve that their relationship started in early 2022.
The date when the 2 attorneys’ relationship started is vital to the continued dispute introduced by Trump’s attorneys, who argue that their romantic fling compromised the integrity of the case.
The protection is attempting to show the existence and extent of any monetary profit to Willis from Wade of their relationship, which is the guts of their argument that Willis ought to be disqualified.
Fox Information’ Timothy H.J. Nerozzi contributed to this report.