Jeffrey Singer, a Cato Institute fellow and longtime surgeon, argues that authorities overreach in well being care undermines affected person autonomy, which must be the guideline in medical choice making. Drawing from historic examples and private expertise, he critiques licensing legal guidelines, the Meals and Drug Administration’s (FDA) drug approval monopoly, and Certificates of Want (CON) laws as protectionist measures that restrict competitors and innovation. Singer contends that personal establishments—like insurers, hospitals, and certification boards—already create robust incentives for security and high quality, making many authorities controls pointless.
Cause‘s Nick Gillespie and Singer additionally discover advanced subjects like end-of-life selection, trans youth well being care, and antibiotic regulation, emphasizing the stability between private freedom and legit public well being issues.
This interview was recorded at The Cause Speakeasy, a month-to-month occasion in New York Metropolis that doubles as a dwell taping of The Cause Interview. Go here for extra info on upcoming Cause occasions.
Subscribe to the brand new YouTube channel for The Cause Interview With Nick Gillespie here.
0:00 — Introduction
0:50 — Singer’s medical profession
3:55 — Your Physique, Your Well being Care
8:40 — Authorities interference in your well being care
14:23 — CON legal guidelines
20:00 — Licensing and credentialing rackets
29:48 — The FDA’s drug approval monopoly
31:30 — The thalidomide scandal
34:11 — Off-label drug prescriptions
37:00 — FDA approval for naloxone and Plan B
40:20 — The American Medical Affiliation’s push for licensing
43:00 — RFK Jr.: reformer or madman?
45:05 — The meals pyramid and different authorities follies
45:57 — Intersex infants and trans well being care
50:09 — Proper to die and affected person autonomy
