Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann on Monday expressed his shock at what he described as an “extremely inappropriate first sentence” in Donald Trump’s submitting to the U.S. Supreme Courtroom through which the previous president’s legal professionals argued he ought to have “whole immunity” for potential legal acts dedicated when he was within the White Home.
“This software is ‘déjà vu once more,’” the filing for a stay in the case from Trump’s legal team started, citing and crediting a so-called “Yogi-ism” from the late New York Yankees catcher Yogi Berra.
“In the event you had been going to be snarky, they could as properly have cited Yogi Bear,” Weissmann informed MSNBC’s Alicia Menendez.
“I imply, that’s only a weird method to begin on one thing they’re asking the Supreme Courtroom,” he added.
Weissmann reminded viewers that Trump’s legal professionals have basically mentioned: “Their place is that the president of the US can kill individuals and so long as he hasn’t been impeached efficiently, in different phrases, impeached and convicted for it, he can’t be prosecuted.”
He added, “So, for one thing this critical, that may be a weird, actually weird first sentence and I feel has an actual tin ear.”
A 3-judge D.C. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals panel earlier this month ruled Trump didn’t take pleasure in absolute immunity as POTUS and, subsequently, may face prosecution within the D.C. election subversion case, one among 4 legal circumstances the Republican 2024 front-runner faces.
Watch the video right here:
