Nice moments in unintended penalties—when one thing that feels like an ideal concept goes horribly fallacious. Watch the whole series.
Half One: We Knead Dough
The Yr: 2019
The Downside: Eating places aren’t signing up for DoorDash.
The Resolution: Show its worth by including eating places totally free—with out notification or permission. As soon as offered with the gross sales knowledge, eating places will enroll in droves!
Seems like an ideal concept, with the very best of intentions. What may presumably go fallacious?
Seems, individuals do not prefer it whenever you mess with their enterprise. Eating places that by no means provided supply have been abruptly getting complaints and bad reviews about orders arriving chilly. The proprietor of AJ’s Pizzeria in Kansas was shocked to seek out his restaurant on the app, and that his $26 specialty pizza was being offered for simply $16. So he ordered some. Lots, in truth. He even stuffed packing containers with plain dough to extend his revenue on every transaction (unlike DoorDash, which lost $668 million dollars in 2019).
Like most jokes, it is all in the delivery.
Half Two: Immediate Replies
The Yr: 2024
The Downside: Google’s search dominance is being challenged by ChatGPT.
The Resolution: Develop an AI to supply useful summaries and solutions to Google queries.
Seems like an ideal concept, with the very best of intentions. What may presumably go fallacious?
Seems, the web is…effectively, the web. The AI began to parrot facts and tips from sites like The Onion and Reddit—insisting that former President Barack Obama was Muslim, that gasoline can be utilized in cooking, and recommending eating rocks as a significant supply of nutritional vitamins and minerals. It even suggested adding glue to pizza, a tip web sleuths tracked right down to a decade-old Reddit put up by a consumer named “Fucksmith.”
However that does lend credibility to its assertion that parrots can prepare dinner.
Half Three: Wikipedi-duh
The Yr: 2013
The Downside: There is a Wikipedia article a couple of labeled French military radio installation!
The Resolution: Demand Wikipedia delete the web page.
Seems like they’ve by no means heard of the Streisand impact! What may presumably go fallacious?
It seems, that is not how Wikipedia works. Since information within the article have been sourced from a publicly out there interview with an Air Drive Main stationed there. Wikipedia balked at the concept that the web page contained labeled knowledge and refused to delete it with out additional clarification. At which level French authorities mentioned, “Oh, that is sensible, by no means thoughts.”
Simply kidding.
They summoned the president of Wikimedia France and threatened him with arrest and imprisonment. He deleted the entry however made positive to alert others that reposting the web page could be against the law. The subsequent day a Swiss contributor restored it—and the following controversy briefly made it the most-read web page on French Wikipedia, which is now out there in 38 completely different languages.
And yeah, we added a link.
Nice moments in unintended penalties: good intentions, dangerous outcomes.
Are you aware an ideal second in unintended penalties? E mail us at comedy@motive.com.
