The 2024 presidential election marketing campaign is mercifully in its remaining weeks, and the 2 main celebration candidates are busy making their closing arguments to voters. Judging by the messaging that their aligned PACs are prioritizing, neither former President Donald Trump nor Vice President Kamala Harris has any curiosity in profitable over small authorities supporters.
Yesterday, Axios reporter Alex Thompson posted a useful thread of eight advertisements that pro-Trump and Harris PACs have spent probably the most cash on within the final three weeks.
A ???? on probably the most aired advertisements prior to now 3 weeks because the campaigns make their closing arguments.
The advert w/ probably the most cash behind it comes from the pro-Harris Tremendous PAC Future Ahead.
“I work laborious. I scrape to get by. Donald Trump desires to present tax breaks to billionaires however… pic.twitter.com/CUCmBdVB1S
— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) October 22, 2024
The professional-Harris advertisements all distinction a clip of Trump telling a room of donors that “you are wealthy as hell” and “we’re gonna offer you tax cuts” with on a regular basis individuals saying they don’t seem to be wealthy as hell and are due to this fact voting for Harris’ agenda of worth controls, continued entitlement spending, and upper-class tax will increase.
The professional-Trump advertisements in the meantime tar Harris as a radical leftist who secured intercourse change operations for incarcerated murderers, opened the border to unlawful immigration, and cackled alongside to ruinously inflationary Bidenomics whereas the globe descended into chaos.
If you cannot inform from that description, the pro-Harris advertisements are extra upbeat, extra focused at average voters, and lighter on substance. The professional-Trump advertisements are a lot darker in tone, extra aggressive in messaging, and extra particular of their assaults on Harris.
None break new floor or embody any shock themes. Each side try to make what is basically an enormous authorities populist case in opposition to the opposite.
The professional-Harris aspect paints Trump as corrupt. The professional-Trump aspect paints Harris as harmful. However each are nonetheless explicitly presenting an every single day “us” versus an evil “them.”
“Donald Trump desires to present tax breaks to billionaires however Kamala Harris has plans to assist us,” says a Florida girl in a pro-Harris advert.
“Kamala’s agenda is that they/them, not you,” says the narrator in a pro-Trump advert whereas photos of trans inmates flash throughout the display.
Each units of advertisements do name for tax cuts, however at no level is that linked to the concept of the federal government spending much less or doing much less. Relatively, tax cuts are offered as a profit that every candidate will bestow on working and middle-class individuals. (The professional-Harris advertisements additionally name for tax will increase on the wealthy.)
Plausibly small authorities populist messages—say about getting Washington off your again, out of your bed room, or out of your method as you begin a enterprise—are nowhere to be discovered.
The concepts of “freedom” or “liberty” do not get a point out, save for one unfavourable use in a pro-Trump advert about how Harris let “killers go free.”
It might properly make sensible and political sense for each campaigns to desert any pitch to voters who care about such parochial points as shrinking the leviathan state. Definitely, neither candidate can credibly declare to be a champion of that trigger at this level.
But when the large cash behind the Harris and Trump campaigns does not care about profitable over libertarian-leaning voters, libertarian-leaning voters cannot be blamed for not being all that invested in who wins the White Home come November.
